[The European Conservative] The Case for Postliberal Feminism

Mary Harrington’s scorching polemic urges us to rediscover feminism’s reactionary potential.

Feminism Against Progress. By Mary Harrington. Forum; 345 pages; $29.99.

In The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism (1976), Harvard maverick sociologist Daniel Bell popularized a new lens to grasp, translate and decipher the West’s post-industrial dysfunctions, a three-way slicing of society into “realms” or “spheres”: the techno-economic, the cultural and the political. This triad may be dismissed as a ready-made mold for the eclectic sensibilities of someone who once described himself as “socialist in economics, liberal in politics and conservative in culture”. But Bell’s analytical tryptic, if well used, can also make sense of his epoch’s upsets and upheavals, and may even prove useful in diagnosing our own. The turmoil of post-1973 America stemmed, in Bell’s view, from an arithmetic inadequacy between the spheres. On one hand, the country’s libertine counterculture and its leftward-lurching politics had been fomenting in the populace a self-gratifying consumerism. On the other, those same hedonistic desires were, by the mid-1970s, proving too expensive to satisfy for the oil-shocked welfare state of the late Great Society. Much as a patient prescribed incompatible drugs or a lab experiment producing a reactive hazard, American social chemistry was being pulled in contradictory directions. The result was a radioactive mix of polarization, discontent, and strife.

Continue reading the entire piece at The European Conservative here.